The cost of a summer

The PhD student funding mechanism at the University of Toronto varies a bit depending on whether you are part of the standard funded cohort, receiving a scholarship like the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, or in some other situation. Still, the basic setup is similar for most people: you probably get three lump sum payments per year, from which you must pay your tuition if it is not automatically deducted. You then receive monthly paycheques for eight months out of the year, as compensation for work as a teaching assistant (TA).

As a PhD student, you are basically expected to do academic work over the summer, but only a minority of people get work as TAs. That makes financing the summer a challenge. It’s possible to do paid work outside the university, but quite challenging to do so if you have academic research obligations and (in your first couple of years) comprehensive exams to prepare for.

I moved out of Massey College for the summer because it is a relatively costly residence with no summer meals. Instead, I spent the span from May 9th until August 21st in University College’s Morrison Hall. Rent for the span was $2,130. In addition to rent, I had to buy food a few gifts, pay my cell phone bill, pay for transportation, and so on. I also did a few short trips over the summer: notably, a few days in Montreal for my brother’s graduation and a day in Ottawa for my friend Andrea’s wedding. All told, non-rent expenses were about $2,869.89 – akin to $27.58 per day.

With after-tuition income of about $15,000 per year, I can’t afford to spend so much on summers for the rest of my PhD. I suppose I will need to work, or win a bigger scholarship.

Fall term 2013

The year is off to a rapidfire start.

As part of the PhD, I need to do a second core seminar this year. I have chosen to take public policy because it accords well with my interests and experience, and apparently has a less onerous reading load than either comparative politics or international relations. I have been advised against taking courses with excessive reading requirements, given the need to re-take my Canadian politics comp in December.

PhD students are expected to take two courses in each term, so I am also taking an environmental politics and policy course. In addition, I am working as a teaching assistant for a course in U.S. government and politics, with three seminars back to back on Thursdays.

At our termly general meeting on the 25th, I will not be running for re-election to the executive of Toronto350.org. Nevertheless, I have some obligations to discharge with them, including two on-campus workshops on divestment and the October 15th film screening (free tickets still available).

In the background at all times, I should be thinking about and preparing for my re-comp in December. I find that I have already forgotten a lot of what I crammed for it the first time. When I re-take it, I will need to demonstrate both a comprehensive knowledge of the literature and an ability to formulate complex and convincing arguments. Toward the latter objective, I should be building up a database of convincing (and conventional, I’ve been warned off controversy) answers to recent comp questions.

Jeffery’s “In View”

My friend Chelsea Jeffery has an exhibition of photographic equipment on at Pearson Airport in Toronto, entitled: “In View: Moments from Canadian Photographic History”. It includes a variety of cameras and prints, as well as related materials like catalogs and

I headed out there today to have a look and take some photos.

More information is available through the Photographic Historical Society of Canada.

First-past-the-post consequences

1968: Pierre Trudeau’s Liberal Party wins 154 seats in the House of Commons, on the basis of 45.37% of the vote. The Progressive Conservatives form the official opposition with 72 seats, based on 31.36% of the popular vote.

1976: René Lévesque’s Parti Québécois wins a majority of 71 seats in the Quebec legislature, on the basis of 41.37% of the vote. The opposition Liberals get 26 seats, based on 33.78% of the popular vote.

2011: Stephen Harper’s Conservatives win a majority government of 166 seats, based on 39.62% of the vote. The opposition New Democrats win 103 seats with 30.63% of the vote (partly because the Liberals collapsed from 77 seats to 34, on the basis of a 7.36% drop in their share of the popular vote).

Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics

Donald Savoie’s 1999 book is the single-best account I have read of the functioning of Canada’s federal government. It focuses on the growth of the strength of ‘the centre’ of government over the previous thirty years, meaning the prime minister, Prime Minister’s Office, Privy Council Office, Department of Finance, and Treasury Board Secretariat. It discusses every important actor in Canada’s federal government, with specific attention paid to the prime minister, cabinet, deputy ministers, the Clerk of the Privy Council, line departments, the Public Service Commission, and so on.

The overwhelming message is about the new dominance of the Prime Minister: over cabinet colleagues, the central agencies, and over parliament itself, which Savoie argues has a diminished capacity to hold the government to account. Savoie devotes considerable attention to the internal structures and machinery of the civil service, as well as the incentives experienced by individuals within it.

I strongly recommend the book for civil servants (especially those who deal with the central agencies or aspire to join them) and for anyone with a strong interest in how Canada’s government functions.

Some language tips from Strunk & White

William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White’s The Elements of Style includes advice on words and expressions that are problematic or often badly used. Where no alternative is listed, their advice is to avoid the use of that word or phrase.

I plan to scan the divestment brief (and my own academic writing) with this list before submission. If I had the programming savvy, I would figure out a way to add these to TextMate‘s syntax highlighting, using regular expressions.

One perspective

[American political science] is attacked for its alleged eschewing of the normative, ahistorical nature, obsession with the quantifiable, and cult of methodology which results in a sterile, status quo oriented political science capable of accumulating mountains of trivia, and incapable of attacking problems of moment.

Cairns, Alan. “Political Science and the Americanization Issue.” Canadian Journal of Political Science. 1975.

Advertising on this site

I am mindful of the fact that the advertising on this site is ugly, and often runs counter to the main lines of argument here. For instance, there are often ads for oil companies.

All told, the ads yield roughly $100 per year, which is enough to cover the costs of hosting the site.

Would people strongly prefer a site without ads? If so, would they be willing to donate to make that happen?

To be fair, I have always encouraged people to use advertising blocking plugins. Adblock Plus, for Chrome and Firefox, is excellent.