These linguistic evasions demonstrate both our continuing lack of seriousness about climate change and how the public policy agenda remains captured by the fossil fuel industry protecting its narrow interests:
Western premiers push back as Guilbeault calls for ‘phase-out of unabated fossil fuels’
We know that greenhouse gases are the cause and there is no solution to climate change without fossil fuel abolition, but we are stuck talking about a “phase down” instead of elimination, and using the magical idea of “abated” fossil fuels to use a technology that does not exist at scale (carbon capture and storage) to justify continued fossil fuel development.
They are doubling up on weasel words. If “abated” emissions are a thing, surely it’s OK to phase _out_ the unabated kind.
This phrasing says: we’re pretending to deal with climate change, but we’re not serious, and by the way, we also are not serious.
Phase down of fossil fuel inevitable and essential, says Cop28 president | Cop28 | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/13/phase-down-of-fossil-fuel-inevitable-and-essential-says-cop28-president